Orpheus

Retirement Savings Calculator

What you will have, and what it will actually buy.

Inputs
years
years
6%

Long-run equity returns have averaged around 7% after inflation.

2.5%
At 67, in today's money
316,791.37
Mostly your moneyBalancedCompounding is workingMostly growth
Nominal balance
789,871.35
Of which you contributed
192,600.00
Of which is growth
597,271.35
Monthly income at 4%
1,055.97
Years of saving
37
Growth as a share of the balance
75.62%
FV = start × (1+r)^n + monthly × ((1+r)^n − 1) ÷ r

The headline 789,871.35 is nominal. After 2.5% inflation over 37 years it buys what 316,791.37 buys today, which is the figure worth planning against.

Every tool runs entirely in your browser. Your files are never uploaded to a server.

Compound what you have saved, add the future value of your contributions, then divide by inflation over the same period. A nominal million in forty years at 2.5% inflation buys about 372,000 today.

How to use Retirement Calculator

  1. Enter your age and target retirement age. The gap between them is the compounding period.
  2. Add what you have saved and what you add monthly. Include employer contributions if you get them.
  3. Set a return and an inflation rate. The inflation figure is what makes the result comparable to today's prices.

About calculating retirement savings

A retirement projection combines two calculations. What you have already saved compounds on its own for the whole period, and each future contribution compounds for however long remains after it is made — the first for decades, the last for a month. The annuity formula handles the second part, and adding the two gives a nominal balance at the target date. The nominal number is the one that gets quoted and the one that misleads. Inflation over a working lifetime is not a minor adjustment: at two and a half percent, prices roughly double every twenty-eight years, so a projection reaching a million in forty years describes purchasing power closer to three hundred and seventy thousand in current terms. Any projection that does not deflate its result is producing a figure that cannot be compared to a salary, a mortgage or a grocery bill, which is to say it cannot be compared to anything. The share of the final balance that comes from growth rather than contributions is the most informative single number here, because it shows whether compounding has had time to do its work. Early in a saving life almost everything in the account is money that was paid in. Given thirty or forty years, growth typically dominates — and that crossover is reached by time invested far more than by contribution size. A pound saved at twenty-five compounds for forty years; the same pound at forty-five compounds for twenty, and at six percent that difference is roughly threefold.

Frequently asked questions

What return should I assume?
Broad equity markets have returned roughly 7% a year above inflation over long periods, though with severe variation across any individual decade. Using 5 to 6% nominal is conservative, and modelling a range matters more than choosing a single figure.
What is the 4% rule?
A starting withdrawal rate from the Trinity study, suggesting 4% of the initial balance adjusted for inflation each year has historically lasted thirty years. It is a rule of thumb from historical US data, not a guarantee, and later work has argued for something closer to 3 to 3.5%.
Why show the figure in today's money?
Because a nominal projection forty years out is close to meaningless. At 2.5% inflation, prices roughly double every 28 years, so a million in 2066 buys what about 372,000 buys now. Only the deflated figure can be compared against a salary you understand.
Does starting early really matter that much?
More than contribution size, over long periods. A contribution made at 25 compounds for forty years; the same amount at 45 compounds for twenty. At 6% that is roughly a threefold difference in what the same money becomes.
Should I include a state or workplace pension?
Not in this projection, which models only what you save. Both matter substantially to the actual retirement picture, and both should be added separately — a state pension in particular can represent a large share of a modest retirement income.

Last updated