How Strong Is This Password?
Entropy in bits, and the patterns that undo it.
Everything is processed in this tab. Nothing you paste is sent anywhere.
Every tool runs entirely in your browser. Your files are never uploaded to a server.
Strength is entropy: the log base two of the alphabet size times the length. Patterns reduce it — a dictionary word with numbers substituted for letters is worth barely more than the word.
How to use Password Strength Checker
- Type or paste a password. Nothing is transmitted; the check runs in your browser.
- Read the entropy figure. In bits, with an estimated offline cracking time.
- Read the findings. Each one is a reason the real strength is below the naive figure.
About checking password strength
Password strength is measured as entropy, the number of bits needed to describe how many candidates an attacker must work through. The naive calculation multiplies the length by the log base two of the alphabet size, which gives an upper bound on strength — the figure a password would have if every character were chosen at random. Almost no password chosen by a person reaches it. What closes the gap is structure. Attackers do not brute-force blindly; they run dictionaries through rule sets that apply the transformations people actually use, and those rules are derived from analysing hundreds of millions of leaked passwords. Substituting a zero for an o, capitalising the first letter, appending a year, adding an exclamation mark — each of these feels like added difficulty and costs an attacker close to nothing, because they are the first mutations tried. A dictionary word dressed up this way is worth barely more than the bare word. This is also why the shape of a password matters as much as its contents. Capital letter, lowercase word, two to four digits, optional punctuation is the single most common structure in every published corpus, and a candidate matching it is found long before an equally long random string. Length remains the property that helps most, because each additional character multiplies the space by the full alphabet size while adding symbols multiplies it only once. And no strength figure addresses the risk that actually compromises accounts, which is reuse: a perfect password used in two places is compromised the moment either is breached.
Frequently asked questions
Is it safe to type a real password here?
What is entropy in bits?
Why is P@ssw0rd rated so badly?
Why does the cracking time assume a fast hash?
Should I trust any strength meter?
Last updated